New Priorities

So I guess I'm going to need a credit card and a phone to get a serious web space for my work. I have neither at the moment, so that's that - for now. I am actually a very strong willed person but I have been applying my will to the creation and protection of my work and to the defense of my image against crooked stars, broadcasters, and web frauds almost every day for the last ten years. As such, I have been unable to put my whole self into a serious effort to quit smoking until now. Unlike those monsters who celebrate the destruction of God's truth by their crimes and want you to join in, I am in no desperate rush to be a star. I need to focus on quitting smoking now and really conquer this addiction before I go any further. So I'm putting all my work on hold and giving my health top priority for as long as it takes. It should take a few months. I'm also in an extremely querulous frame of mind and probably not totally responsible for any angry outbursts at this time. This is a typical withdrawal symptom for smokers trying to quit. Before I go, since this might be my last note for a long while, I would like to leave you with a thought to discourage any further infringements of my copyright while I'm offline. Before you try to steal my work, ask yourself the following. If the star copyright offenders listed in my Copyright Issues page had a chance to go back to 2007 and live it over again with the knowledge they have now, do you think they'd steal my work again? The answer to that is a resounding no! So think ahead or you may end up making a terrible, irreversible mistake. June 10, 2017: I'll keep you posted of my progress in my fight against nicotine addiction in my Coats from the Lost and Found blog. I added a new post to it today: God Is Always Right.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

Maybe It's YouTube's Fault

Now I'm in the public library to find a place to post my frameset with all of my blogs and videos together on it. I'm looking for just a blank space that I can fill in completely with my own html. As soon as I find this place and post my frameset there, I'll post a link to it from this account so you know where to go to see my new videos and blogs. I wish I could have had my own space on the web to post my work in 2007 instead of getting stuck sharing it on YouTube. I bet I'd have been a lot better off than I am now. When I posted my songs onto YouTube, they were treated as YouTube's property when they are are my property. YouTube punished me for erasing my songs by facilitating all the fraud that followed with my music from 2007 right to the present. But it's their fault that I erased my songs because they wouldn't show my true number of views on my view counter, just as they have been doing ever since. At the end of that horrible year, 2007, I begged YouTube to let me see my views because I was afraid I might be crazy. They wouldn't do it. I guess they thought that by featuring everything I clicked on, that was enough. No, that just made me think I was crazy, too. With no numbers to support all the weird things I was seeing, I thought I was crazy. And when we think we're crazy, we don't trust the things we say or write - especially when some of them, like my 2007 Christian blogs, radically depart from our normal position. YouTube asked me why I erased my account and I said it was lame. I said it was lame because at that moment I thought I was crazy. And I thought I was crazy because they hid my popularity from me when I was bigger than the stars on TV. And after so much harm and so much loss came from hiding my popularity, they still hide my popularity now. If I'd have known that my songs had millions of views, I most certainly wouldn't have erased them. They seem to think that hiding my popularity is trivial when it may be the whole cause for the crimes that occurred with my work. Why do they have a view counter on their page? Isn't it to help show people that a video is popular? So why do they hide my true views? If they're not going to show my true views, they should take the view counter off my page so it doesn't mislead anyone. I think that hiding my true number of web views is false and misleading. There must be something illegal about it and I don't know why I've tolerated it for such a long time. Hiding my web views opens the door to all kinds of crime with my work. How's Wise Hall Flea doing? Why did they want to boast about their million and a half views on the radio? I guess people are impressed by high numbers like that, eh? The same high numbers that YouTube withholds from the pages of their greatest fraud victim. As if my views are only in the single digits with people like Mick and Keith prancing around with music stolen out of my account! Just a few, mate? Why can't the Rolling Stones write their own hits anymore? Maybe it's because they don't have to because YouTube lets them have my hits. Were they envious of my two views, YouTube? No, they were envious of my true views, the ones you allow to fall into the hands of local frauds and hackers every year to make them look popular with my popularity. And how about my comments? Do you think I don't need my comments? If so, you're awfully opinionated for something that belongs to me and not to you. Why don't you mind your own business and let people who want to support my music directly with their comments do so? Why do you think it's okay to give my comments to all your pets and leave my page blank? You must be totally warped. My frameset has no view counter. As such, I think it is more honest than their manipulating website. I would rather people listen to my music and dismiss my views. But YouTube only has a view counter so they can lie to us with it.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

People Who Think They're Funny

Do you want to know a little more about the kind of people who think they're funny enough to be comedy stars? (Is Saturday Night Live still on the air, by the way? Or was it CANCELLED for committing too much FILTHY FRAUD with my web posts? Good riddance, if that's the case.) Anyway, you know what they think is witty? Making fun of my name. They think my name is funny because it has 'kow' in it and they think that's the spelling for the word 'cow'. And they think this is so hilarious that they go out of their way to try to humiliate me with it, even sending overweight women around to pose as my fans. But if this joke really were funny, they wouldn't have needed to steal every word of my comedy posts and put their names on them before anyone would laugh for them. So I wonder if I've shared my last YouTube video. That would be a good way to leave YouTube, I think. And now I can post my next batch of songs somewhere else. And if I'm successful with my next batch, I can say, 'Look everyone, I shared these two hundred songs on YouTube and all I got for it was being falsely accused of fraud and a ten year long fight against their crooked rock star friends, but I put my new songs over here and now I'm a star with my music instead of YouTube's corrupt friends being stars with music. You should all come over to this other website and try your luck over here if you want any hope of success.' Is that what YouTube wants me to do? Because I'm not going to stay with them if I'm going to be disrespected by their vicious staff, like that person who wanted me to suffer more pain from George Carlin's 2006-2008 HBO comedy fraud with my erased statements. Day Five of the gum and I didn't crave a cigarette when I got out of bed this morning. And I drank my coffee for the flavor of the coffee and didn't crave a cigarette. I didn't need a gum until I'd been awake for longer than an hour. I listened to Unabused to keep up my fighting spirit, along with several other of my original songs that are as good or better than anything on the rock radio.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

Perverse Acts of Evil

So who's responsible for filling up my recommended videos with George Carlin's criminal face? I'm considering finding another website for my videos over it. I know that it was deliberate and malicious. After all the miserable harm to my life that YouTube has enabled in the last ten years since I so naively shared my music with them in 2007, I'm reaching the limit of my endurance. George Carlin stole my poem too. Modern Man. I think stealing poems is a perverse act of evil. And who else steals poems? Let's see, Ellen stole Sappho Asparagus and the Widower. Jay Leno stole Jackie the Pro and the Trailblazer. Saturday Night Live stole the Octiverse - over two thousand lines of rhyming verse that took me three solid months to write - and large numbers of my rhyming 'Songs that Don't Rhyme.' The Simpsons stole at least Part V of the Herald, though I think that whole half hour episode consisted of my poetry. Tom Hanks stole the Veteran. Dateline NBC stole the Porcupine Girls. Oh yes, and Jon Stewart, you know, sweet Jon Stewart, Canada's most trusted source of news, stole Lifetimes and The Poisoned. Etc, etc, etc, etc... You know their crimes better than I do because you watch them on TV and apparently fall in love with them when they plagiarize my content. And these people had you hurling eggs at my window because you thought I was stealing from them. Is anyone hurling eggs at them now? I don't get it. Stealing music and poetry and original comedy sketches is such a dirty crime and everyone thought I was such a creep for posting my own words in the web. And now it seems like the broadcasters are trying to make the crime of stealing my life-work somehow decent and acceptable. What the hell kind of wicked crime culture is this? Are we sure we're Christian? Are we sure that we believe in God? With what evil lie do they hold back my visible fan support this week? Every week I hear about how some lying fuck has to restore my image and it's because he or she was allowed to destroy it for an undetermined period. They all line up and keep a constant assault going against my image for ten years and no one seems to know how to put a stop to it. Let me give you examples of some of the lies that support their crimes. When Beyonce had my song Under My Umbrella, I heard I was a racist. When the Crystalids had four LP's of my songs, I heard I was a child molester. And when Blue Rodeo had my songs earlier this year, I heard they had a pen that signed my dick. How would you all like to post your work on YouTube and Blogger and get a result like that? And then they want to shove George Carlin's face up my ass on top of it afterward. So what unspeakable lie are they telling everyone this week? Why can't we have an industry that wants to focus on making profits instead of covering up losses with miserable lies about its fraud victim? Imagine how much more money they'd have made since 2010 if I'd managed to survive the gauntlet of crime they threw me in from the outset. All those hits I wrote in 2011 wouldn't have gone to waste on a noisy band of posers while I struggled to find a new home. And all the tried and true ones would have stayed on the radio to keep making money all the way to the present. What stupid lie would they counter this fact with, in order to look like they know what they're doing? Why are all the liars and frauds supported by the industry when the victim of their crimes has to fend for himself? Why do I have no money when I wrote hit songs? Why doesn't someone ask that George Carlin fan over at YouTube? Why wouldn't lawyers want to sue Saturday Night Live when I brought them all the evidence to do it? I hate having to ponder questions like this in my overheated room when I'm having trouble sleeping at night. Do you all think I deserve this for merely writing good songs and good poems and good comedy scripts and sharing them on the web? No one deserves such horrible, unjust, endless torment. I hate my life. What's this I hear about my mother's grave? Yeah, how old was my mom when Dateline NBC swooped down on her to trick her into consenting to their broadcast? Wasn't she eighty-seven? NBC picks on eighty-seven year old ladies and then they want to set the public standard for decency. They pick on old ladies and peaceful artists and they lie their faces off about me when I call them on it. Who needs a bunch of stars who've obviously become totally corrupt when I can write circles around them all by myself? I think they've enjoyed the limelight for far longer than they deserve already. I'm bloody well sick of them and I won't miss them. The sooner they all die and join their buddy George in hell, the better. And if you end up there for following them, it won't be my fault. Don't be like my brother Roger, who I continually warned to leave my things alone and who ended up getting nailed for stealing them. Now he thinks I ruined his life. Go back and read how I warned him to leave my work alone. And I didn't bust him, the authorities did. And I didn't punish him, the authorities did. All I did was warn the stupid prick. And he's typical of all these fools who the corporate media loved so much in my place.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

Typical Hypocrisy

We sure have a lot of productions in our neighborhood. Our neighborhood seems to have all the productions. And no one ever asks us if we want them, they just ask the City of Vancouver. It must be great for the stars to have a large section of the city where the people have no rights so that they can trample all over them with their productions. Does no one want to shoot out on their side of town? Why? It's just as urban as our side. Is it because the stars who live there find productions a nuisance? Do they not want to have to step over cables or to be told to walk around the block when they're only ten feet away from their doorstep? But they must all think it's okay for me to be treated like that. And who needs this production? I don't. I don't need anything from the TV or radio. I don't need their evil manipulating news broadcasts either. I'll live my own life, thank you very much. Maybe one day we can find something more productive for people to do in this world than to bullshit each other with cameras. Who says I'm humble? Why do you want me to be humble? I'm not humble, I'm just reasonable, but maybe a reasonable man looks humble in contrast to so many psychopathic stars who have outrageous delusions of grandeur. By the way, was anyone fooled by the face of Goldie Hawn, posing with her great grandchild on the side of that bus? When was Laugh In again? You know: Knock! knock! Who's there? Some asshole with a disappointing punchline! Wasn't that 1968 or 1969? Why hasn't her face aged in almost fifty years? Because she doesn't want to retire after being a star for almost fifty years. My guess is that she is over eighty percent polypropylene by now.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

Tyrants Fear Intelligence

I had to come down to another library branch because all the computers were taken from the other library I posted in today. Odd, a crowd suddenly gathered like that. Anyway, I've managed to calm down after seeing the face of George Carlin in four of my recommended videos on YouTube. The effect on me was so profoundly irritating that I must wonder if putting his videos in my face qualifies as some form of criminal harassment. If so, I hope the boys will move in and engage the culprit. At least he or she is helping everyone to see how this web crime with my posts was able to get so far along over there at YouTube. Certainly not my fault. These criminals really get to have fun with an innocent victim here, eh? They let that hotel owner try to keep me homeless in 2012 so another fraud band could prance around with the new songs I was saving to help me overcome the stigma of the Crystalids crime. Isn't it bad enough that I had to go homeless because I couldn't stand the noise in that hotel anymore? But they let this guy make it harder for me. This is pure sadism. It never ends. And you better hope you're not popular on YouTube if you need immediate medical attention for something as excruciating as kidney stones, like I did late last year. As if their backstabbing lies didn't cause me enough psychological harm, they let me puke my guts out with kidney pain for forty-five minutes to pay for my YouTube success. Now I'm stressed out from trying to quit smoking and they're making it more stressful for me by sticking faces of fraud stars in my face when I sign in to YouTube. Why don't they just come and nail me to the wall of my hovel and get it over with? That's how they like to treat talent. Oh, but the Shards steal Virtue from me and get on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno to play it the next day. And here's the author of the song ten years later, trying to save enough money to finance a tour out of his fucking disability cheque that he was forced to apply for when he has more ability than all of his goofy assailants put together and everyone admires them on TV as people of superior ability. Did you read all those instances of George Carlin's plagiarism? A lot of good laughs in all that, eh? I still like my joke about using 'water landing' instead of 'fiery death' for a flight attendant to refer to a plane crash. And what motive could I possibly have for saying George Carlin stole my blogs other than telling the truth? Yes, the truth! Does someone have trouble with the truth out there? If so, why? Why do you fear truth? The only people who fear truth are scoundrels. How's the corporate media? Have they thought of any new strategies in their war against talent? (To the media:) What's my crime again, corporate media? Is it the same one you told everyone last time or did you think of a new one? You know what's happening right now while you're putting so much effort into your personal war against an innocent poet? Some creep is assaulting a helpless victim in the street. And he'll get away with it because you have everyone looking at me. Not only that, he wears his hair short and puts on a suit and tie to look respectable - just like Ted and Paul. How many helpless victims are you going to sacrifice to him while you stay focused on your hate campaign to spare your precious egos? (To the media:) Do you think everyone loves George Carlin? God, you're clued out. Bill Maher is not everyone. I heard someone say 'he's the beast' today in reference to George Carlin. Sounds like she disagrees with you about George Carlin. Are you going to wreck her life now too? (To the media:) Why would anyone want to keep loving an old star like that after his crimes were exposed on the web? Do you think no one believes me? Do you think I'm lying? Don't you think that if Saturday Night Live could steal all those hundreds of my posts, George Carlin could do the same? Didn't he launch Saturday Night Live? Isn't he their buddy? Why are you protecting him? What good is it doing? (To the media:) I think I know the problem that you've always had with me, I'm good. I'm a good talent. And you fear the work of good talent because it stimulates people and makes them think. You don't want people to think. You want them to be listless zombies under your control. So when someone like myself comes along and posts the kind of work that raises the consciousness of the public and stimulates real thought, you desperately need to tear it all apart and pass it off as something rather less than what it was to start with. (To the media:) Let me give you an example with my latest YouTube post of my poem the Mammals. It's very creative and stimulates ideas. For instance, the words I wrote about Gladys the heifer might resonate with people who feel trapped in the routine of their jobs. But that won't happen if these words take a back seat to Tina Fey's face on the TV. Then the whole work is dismissed as a simple work of comedy with little or no depth. You don't want people to be stimulated by my work, you just want them to pay your stupid stars for it. And there are laws against that. Your stars were prosecuted and punished in prison. They got kicked off the air. And now I have a lot more new work to share and there is really nothing you can do about it. (To the media:) Do you think our society is great? If it is, it would be in spite of you and your efforts. What's so great about a minority of predators suppressing the masses by imposing restraints on free thought? This a fine hell you've created here for artists and poets and it's heaven for frauds and predators. Are you proud of that? Or are you only proud of the way you lie about it? I better end this note now. I'm too upset to think clearly.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.

Wild Conclusion

Great success from bare survival might be brazenly divided Where the rule of Mother Nature to the gates may yield For advantage's pursuit to bring an outcome undecided Not the compensation owed the mammals in the field I said in my video today that this last verse from my poem the Mammals essentially says that animals have it harder than we do. Some of you might want me to elaborate on this; that is, if you see this as a work of poetry and not merely as an ordinary comedy sketch on TV. I scored a hundred percent on poetry comprehension when I took my communication test for my advertising course in 1984 and I am the author of this poem, so let me explain it better for you. Here in the civilized realm, hard work does not guarantee success. I worked my ass off on these posts when I first shared them, but a bunch of dishonest, spoiled celebrities enjoyed the success for them. That goes against nature. The way of the wild (generally speaking) is that when you work, you gain from your work. This is the compensation owed the 'mammals in the field.' By the same token, however, this law of nature condemns wild animals to a life of constant struggle, which is how I see the verse as indicating that animals have a much harder lot than people. While I had to work hard and someone else got paid for it, at least I can still collect welfare, unlike an animal.
Arguments Copyright Issues Comedy Sketches Cartoons Lyrics Poems
More Statements Scripts Songs
© 2017. Statements by David Skerkowski. All rights reserved.